Gulf Coast flood losses: Ivan, not Katrina.

Every paid National Flood Insurance Program claim filed in Mobile and Baldwin County, Alabama, since 1978 — 34,861 of them, $1,026,362,717 in net payments. The federal record disagrees with the local memory on one specific point, and it is the first thing below. Every figure here is recomputed from FEMA's own endpoint at build time, and the aggregate data is a download away.

34,861 claims · $1,026,362,717 net paid · 1978-01-15 to 2026-06-18 · FEMA asOfDate 2026-08-03 · aggregate data CSV

Ivan produced 19% more claims here than Katrina.

Katrina is the storm the country reaches for whenever Gulf Coast flooding comes up. In the federal claims record for these two Alabama counties it is second. Hurricane Ivan accounts for 6,699 paid NFIP claims and $351,938,152; Katrina accounts for 5,629 claims and $287,940,155. Ivan leads on both measures — 19% more claims and 22.2% more paid.

That is a local fact, not a national one. Katrina's catastrophic losses landed to the west, in Louisiana and Mississippi. Ivan came ashore on the Alabama coast, and the claims follow the landfall: its dates of loss here run 2004-09-15 to 2004-09-18. Anyone writing about flood risk on this stretch of coast using Katrina as the reference storm is using the wrong one, and the correction is a single API query away.

FEMA-named eventDates of lossClaimsNet paid (nominal)
Hurricane Ivan2004-09-15 to 2004-09-186,699$351,938,152
Hurricane Katrina2005-08-28 to 2005-08-305,629$287,940,155
Hurricane Georges1998-09-27 to 1998-10-024,468$67,402,497
Hurricane Sally2020-09-14 to 2020-09-183,262$121,678,990
Hurricane Frederic1979-09-12 to 1979-09-132,354$31,744,273
Flooding1980-05-16 to 1998-03-131,887$24,107,215
Hurricane Opal1995-10-03 to 1995-10-051,615$15,555,109
Hurricane Danny1997-07-18 to 1997-07-211,075$10,196,455
Mid-spring storms2014-04-28 to 2014-05-011,063$46,437,576
Tropical Storm Isidore2002-09-24 to 2002-09-29951$5,536,235
Hurricane Elena1985-08-29 to 1985-09-03827$2,597,195
Hurricane Zeta2020-10-28 to 2020-10-30241$3,928,114
Hurricane Ike2008-09-11 to 2008-09-15229$1,740,963
Hurricane Isaac2012-08-27 to 2012-09-04197$1,190,007
Hurricane Gustav2008-08-30 to 2008-09-03162$1,488,557
Not a named storm1979-03-03128$343,330

Events with at least 100 claims. All 27 labeled events are in the CSV. Dates are the observed minimum and maximum date of loss among the claims FEMA itself labeled with that name — not an inferred window.

Not every row in that table is a storm

“Flooding” is a generic FEMA bucket, not a named system. It holds 1,887 claims spread across 1980 to 1998 — nearly two decades of unrelated events sharing one label. It cannot be read as an event the way Ivan or Sally can, so it is printed as what it is rather than quietly dropped to make the table tidier. “Not a named storm” (128 claims, all dated 1979-03-03) is FEMA's explicit label for the same idea.

“Mid-spring storms” (1,063 claims, $46,437,576) is the late-April 2014 rainfall event. It is the fifth costliest labeled event in this dataset by dollars paid, and it has no name anybody remembers, because it was not a hurricane.

11.1% of claims carry no event label at all

30,987 of 34,861 claims (88.9%) carry a FEMA-assigned floodEvent name. The remaining 3,87411.1% — carry none, and they are reported as unlabeled rather than assigned to whichever storm happened to be near their date of loss. Date-window guessing would inflate every event in the table above by an unknown amount, and there would be no way to tell which figures had been inflated.

Three ZIP Codes hold 55.1% of every claim.

36542 — Gulf Shores — carries 9,444 claims on its own, 27.1% of the two-county total. Add 36528 (Dauphin Island) and 36561 (Orange Beach) and three ZIP Codes account for 55.1% of the claims and 56.8% of the dollars. The rest of the record is a long tail.

Paid NFIP claims since 1978 — Mobile & Baldwin counties, Alabama, by ZIP codeValues range from 0 to 9,444, grouped into 5 quantile buckets shaded light to dark. A full data table with every ZIP code and value follows the map for non-visual access.36502 (Baldwin Co.): 7 Paid NFIP claims since 197836505 (Mobile Co.): 3 Paid NFIP claims since 197836507 (Baldwin Co.): 41 Paid NFIP claims since 197836509 (Mobile Co.): 644 Paid NFIP claims since 197836511 (Baldwin Co.): 82 Paid NFIP claims since 197836512 (Mobile Co.): 4 Paid NFIP claims since 197836513 (Mobile Co.): 0 Paid NFIP claims since 197836521 (Mobile Co.): 12 Paid NFIP claims since 197836522 (Mobile Co.): 7 Paid NFIP claims since 197836523 (Mobile Co.): 656 Paid NFIP claims since 197836525 (Mobile Co.): 16 Paid NFIP claims since 197836526 (Baldwin Co.): 265 Paid NFIP claims since 197836527 (Baldwin Co.): 103 Paid NFIP claims since 197836528 (Mobile Co.): 5,003 Paid NFIP claims since 197836530 (Baldwin Co.): 690 Paid NFIP claims since 197836532 (Baldwin Co.): 1,291 Paid NFIP claims since 197836535 (Baldwin Co.): 705 Paid NFIP claims since 197836541 (Mobile Co.): 42 Paid NFIP claims since 197836542 (Baldwin Co.): 9,444 Paid NFIP claims since 197836544 (Mobile Co.): 37 Paid NFIP claims since 197836547 (Baldwin Co.): 295 Paid NFIP claims since 197836549 (Baldwin Co.): 175 Paid NFIP claims since 197836550 (Baldwin Co.): 5 Paid NFIP claims since 197836551 (Baldwin Co.): 27 Paid NFIP claims since 197836555 (Baldwin Co.): 245 Paid NFIP claims since 197836559 (Baldwin Co.): 57 Paid NFIP claims since 197836560 (Mobile Co.): 4 Paid NFIP claims since 197836561 (Baldwin Co.): 4,770 Paid NFIP claims since 197836562 (Baldwin Co.): 9 Paid NFIP claims since 197836564 (Baldwin Co.): 509 Paid NFIP claims since 197836567 (Baldwin Co.): 49 Paid NFIP claims since 197836568 (Mobile Co.): 0 Paid NFIP claims since 197836571 (Mobile Co.): 461 Paid NFIP claims since 197836572 (Mobile Co.): 107 Paid NFIP claims since 197836574 (Baldwin Co.): 145 Paid NFIP claims since 197836575 (Mobile Co.): 25 Paid NFIP claims since 197836576 (Baldwin Co.): 89 Paid NFIP claims since 197836578 (Baldwin Co.): 3 Paid NFIP claims since 197836579 (Baldwin Co.): 7 Paid NFIP claims since 197836580 (Baldwin Co.): 277 Paid NFIP claims since 197836582 (Mobile Co.): 883 Paid NFIP claims since 197836587 (Mobile Co.): 7 Paid NFIP claims since 197836602 (Mobile Co.): 179 Paid NFIP claims since 197836603 (Mobile Co.): 618 Paid NFIP claims since 197836604 (Mobile Co.): 123 Paid NFIP claims since 197836605 (Mobile Co.): 1,976 Paid NFIP claims since 197836606 (Mobile Co.): 561 Paid NFIP claims since 197836607 (Mobile Co.): 538 Paid NFIP claims since 197836608 (Mobile Co.): 579 Paid NFIP claims since 197836609 (Mobile Co.): 247 Paid NFIP claims since 197836610 (Mobile Co.): 221 Paid NFIP claims since 197836611 (Mobile Co.): 218 Paid NFIP claims since 197836612 (Mobile Co.): 26 Paid NFIP claims since 197836613 (Mobile Co.): 31 Paid NFIP claims since 197836615 (Mobile Co.): 5 Paid NFIP claims since 197836617 (Mobile Co.): 348 Paid NFIP claims since 197836618 (Mobile Co.): 58 Paid NFIP claims since 197836619 (Mobile Co.): 484 Paid NFIP claims since 197836652 (Mobile Co.): 39 Paid NFIP claims since 197836663 (Mobile Co.): 0 Paid NFIP claims since 197836688 (Mobile Co.): 0 Paid NFIP claims since 197836693 (Mobile Co.): 329 Paid NFIP claims since 197836695 (Mobile Co.): 91 Paid NFIP claims since 1978

Paid NFIP claims since 1978

  • 07
  • 747.6
  • 47.6218.6
  • 218.6551.8
  • 551.89,444
  • No data
View the full ZIP code data table (63 ZIP codes)
ZIP codeCountyPaid NFIP claims since 1978
36502 (Baldwin Co.)Baldwin County7
36505 (Mobile Co.)Mobile County3
36507 (Baldwin Co.)Baldwin County41
36509 (Mobile Co.)Mobile County644
36511 (Baldwin Co.)Baldwin County82
36512 (Mobile Co.)Mobile County4
36513 (Mobile Co.)Mobile County0
36521 (Mobile Co.)Mobile County12
36522 (Mobile Co.)Mobile County7
36523 (Mobile Co.)Mobile County656
36525 (Mobile Co.)Mobile County16
36526 (Baldwin Co.)Baldwin County265
36527 (Baldwin Co.)Baldwin County103
36528 (Mobile Co.)Mobile County5,003
36530 (Baldwin Co.)Baldwin County690
36532 (Baldwin Co.)Baldwin County1,291
36535 (Baldwin Co.)Baldwin County705
36541 (Mobile Co.)Mobile County42
36542 (Baldwin Co.)Baldwin County9,444
36544 (Mobile Co.)Mobile County37
36547 (Baldwin Co.)Baldwin County295
36549 (Baldwin Co.)Baldwin County175
36550 (Baldwin Co.)Baldwin County5
36551 (Baldwin Co.)Baldwin County27
36555 (Baldwin Co.)Baldwin County245
36559 (Baldwin Co.)Baldwin County57
36560 (Mobile Co.)Mobile County4
36561 (Baldwin Co.)Baldwin County4,770
36562 (Baldwin Co.)Baldwin County9
36564 (Baldwin Co.)Baldwin County509
36567 (Baldwin Co.)Baldwin County49
36568 (Mobile Co.)Mobile County0
36571 (Mobile Co.)Mobile County461
36572 (Mobile Co.)Mobile County107
36574 (Baldwin Co.)Baldwin County145
36575 (Mobile Co.)Mobile County25
36576 (Baldwin Co.)Baldwin County89
36578 (Baldwin Co.)Baldwin County3
36579 (Baldwin Co.)Baldwin County7
36580 (Baldwin Co.)Baldwin County277
36582 (Mobile Co.)Mobile County883
36587 (Mobile Co.)Mobile County7
36602 (Mobile Co.)Mobile County179
36603 (Mobile Co.)Mobile County618
36604 (Mobile Co.)Mobile County123
36605 (Mobile Co.)Mobile County1,976
36606 (Mobile Co.)Mobile County561
36607 (Mobile Co.)Mobile County538
36608 (Mobile Co.)Mobile County579
36609 (Mobile Co.)Mobile County247
36610 (Mobile Co.)Mobile County221
36611 (Mobile Co.)Mobile County218
36612 (Mobile Co.)Mobile County26
36613 (Mobile Co.)Mobile County31
36615 (Mobile Co.)Mobile County5
36617 (Mobile Co.)Mobile County348
36618 (Mobile Co.)Mobile County58
36619 (Mobile Co.)Mobile County484
36652 (Mobile Co.)Mobile County39
36663 (Mobile Co.)Mobile County0
36688 (Mobile Co.)Mobile County0
36693 (Mobile Co.)Mobile County329
36695 (Mobile Co.)Mobile County91

Buckets are quantiles, not equal intervals — this distribution is severely right-skewed, and equal intervals would render every ZIP but the top three in a single shade. Boundaries are 2020 Census ZIP Code Tabulation Areas. The legend keeps a “no data” swatch for the encoding's sake; no polygon uses it here, because every ZCTA in frame has a counted value, including the 4 that counted to zero.

ZIPCountyClaimsShare of all claimsNet paid (nominal)
36542Baldwin9,44427.1%$217,664,074
36528Mobile5,00314.4%$111,677,099
36561Baldwin4,77013.7%$254,028,067
36605Mobile1,9765.7%$55,087,254
36532Baldwin1,2913.7%$35,957,457
36582Baldwin and Mobile8832.5%$25,359,666
36535Baldwin7052%$30,918,057
36530Baldwin6902%$32,091,648
36523Baldwin and Mobile6561.9%$15,861,456
36509Baldwin and Mobile6441.8%$32,549,397

Ten ZIPs shown of 117 in the record. Claims are summed across counties where a ZIP carries both; the CSV keeps the per-county split.

What the map is not showing

The shading is claim volume, not flood risk and not damage severity. A ZIP with more NFIP policies in force will generate more claims than a ZIP with fewer, independently of how badly either one flooded. FEMA does not publish a policies-in-force count at this granularity in the claims dataset, so there is no denominator here and no per-policy or per-capita normalisation is available. A dark polygon means many paid claims. It does not mean a house there is more likely to flood than a house in a pale one.

989 claims (2.8%) are not on the map at all. They sit on 58 reported ZIP keys with no ZCTA polygon in these two counties — 502 with no ZIP recorded, some on post-office-box ZIPs that have no tabulation area, and a handful on ZIPs belonging to other parts of Alabama entirely. 4 of the 63 ZCTAs in frame have no claims in this dataset and are drawn as a measured zero.

25 of the 49 years on record had fewer than fifty claims.

Flood loss on this coast is not a steady annual cost with occasional spikes. It is a flat line interrupted by a handful of days. 2004 and 2005 — Ivan and Katrina — hold 13,082 claims between them, which is 37.5% of everything filed across 48 years. Meanwhile 25 separate years produced fewer than fifty claims each.

YearClaimsNet paid (nominal)Share of all claims
20046,862$357,567,49319.7%
20056,220$302,004,20117.8%
19985,085$72,816,85614.6%
20203,600$127,510,21510.3%
19792,596$32,326,9637.4%
19951,689$15,908,2784.8%
19811,166$17,931,8493.3%
19971,149$10,892,1583.3%
20141,112$46,800,8613.2%
20021,040$5,795,1633%

Ten years shown of 49 (1978 to 2026). Every year is in the CSV.

DecadeClaimsNet paid (nominal)
1970s2,683$32,566,748
1980s3,342$28,867,659
1990s8,226$101,488,109
2000s14,970$674,122,984
2010s1,886$58,149,660
2020s3,754$131,167,558

The 1970s row covers 1978-01-15 onward; the 2020s row is incomplete and runs to 2026-06-18. Dollars are nominal and not comparable across decades — see section 06.

The 2010s are the quiet decade in this record — 1,886 claims across ten years, less than a seventh of the 2000s. Read that as the absence of a landfalling storm in the window, not as a change in exposure. Sally arrived in September 2020 and the 2020s row passed the entire 2010s in a single event.

16.9% of claims came from policies rated outside the high-risk zone.

Zones B, C and X are FEMA's codes for areas outside the Special Flood Hazard Area — moderate or minimal risk on the rating map, the places where flood insurance is usually optional rather than required by a lender. Those three zones account for 5,890 paid claims and $229,402,201 in this record.

Rated zoneClaimsShareNet paid (nominal)
AE11,65233.4%$363,345,095
VE4,58013.1%$124,232,258
X2,8978.3%$106,997,089
C2,1456.2%$95,481,381
A081,8185.2%$75,589,263
A101,6994.9%$30,774,940
V091,4144.1%$41,441,876
A091,0603%$31,570,161
B8482.4%$26,923,730
A077692.2%$21,472,313

Ten zones shown of 37 distinct codes. AE and VE are the modern high-risk codes; the numbered zones (A08, A10, V09 and the rest) come from older Flood Insurance Rate Maps and appear mostly on older losses. 239 claims carry no zone code and are grouped as UNKNOWN.

The zone is the rating, not the geography

ratedFloodZone is the zone the policywas rated in at the time of loss. It is not a statement about where the property sits on today's map. Flood Insurance Rate Maps in these counties have been revised repeatedly since 1978, and a 1979 claim rated A08 tells you what the 1979 map said, not what the current one says. Reading this table as “X-zone properties flood at this rate” would be wrong twice over — wrong on the map vintage, and wrong for the denominator reason in section 02.

Two more distributions worth having, both in full in the CSV. Tidal water overflow is the single largest recorded cause at 15,992 claims (45.9%), which is what storm surge looks like once it has been written down as an insurance code. And 28,165 claims — 80.8% — are on single-family homes. This is a residential loss record, not a commercial one.

20 ZIP Codes carried the wrong county label until this run.

The first version of this aggregation grouped claims by ZIP Code alone and stamped each ZIP with a county name. That is a bug, because a reported ZIP is not constrained to lie inside the county the claim was filed under. The two counties are fetched in sequence, Baldwin first, so every ZIP with claims under both counties inherited the Baldwin label — and both counties' claims were merged into that one mislabeled row.

The worst case was ZIP 36582. It has 882 claims filed under Mobile County and 1 filed under Baldwin County. The old aggregation emitted a single row reading 883 claims, county Baldwin — a figure a local reader would have caught on sight.

ZIPOld row (wrong)Corrected rows
36582883 claims, Baldwin County882 Mobile · 1 Baldwin
36523656 claims, Baldwin County655 Mobile · 1 Baldwin
36509644 claims, Baldwin County643 Mobile · 1 Baldwin

The fix is to key the aggregation on the (ZIP, county) pair, so a shared ZIP produces one row per county with its own honest count. 20ZIPs do that here, plus the bucket of claims with no ZIP recorded at all. Every other aggregation on this page — the totals, the years, the events, the zones, the causes, the occupancy types — was unaffected, and the script's assertion that each grouping sums back to the fetched claim count passes before and after.

What the splits actually look like

Nearly all of them are lopsided: hundreds of claims under one county and one or two under the other. Some of that is genuine — ZIP Code delivery areas cross county lines. Some of it is data entry on a form filled out during a flood. Either way, the honest shape is two rows with their real counts, not one row with a label picked by fetch order.

A related caveat rides along with it: a handful of reported ZIPs in this record are Montgomery and Anniston ZIPs, both well inland of these two counties. reportedZipCode is a field on a claim form, and it is not validated against the county the claim was filed under. Those claims are kept, counted, and left visible in the CSV rather than silently dropped.

$1,026,362,717 is not the flood damage in these counties.

These are insured NFIP losses, and only those

Every dollar in this dataset was paid by the National Flood Insurance Program on an NFIP policy. Uninsured losses are absent. Losses covered by private flood carriers are absent. Losses in communities that do not participate in the NFIP are absent, and so is every property whose owner let the policy lapse or never bought one. Flood insurance take-up in coastal counties is well under universal, so the true damage figure is larger than $1,026,362,717 by an amount this data cannot measure. If you need one sentence: this is what the federal flood insurer paid, not what the water cost.

Claim counts are not damage severity

The number of claims in a ZIP is a function of how many policies were in force there as much as of how badly it flooded. A ZIP covering a densely built stretch of insured beachfront will out-claim a thinly settled inland one before the question of severity is even reached. FEMA publishes policies-in-force separately from claims, and not at a granularity that joins cleanly to these groupings, so no per-policy or per-capita rate appears anywhere on this page. Ranking places by claim count is a ranking of insured exposure, and it should be read that way.

The dollars are nominal, and they are not adjusted

Every dollar figure here is the amount paid at the time, in that year's dollars, with no inflation adjustment applied. A 1979 payment on Frederic and a 2020 payment on Sally are added together in the totals as if they were the same unit, and they are not. I have not published an adjusted series because doing it properly means choosing a price index and a base year and defending both, and the headline finding does not depend on it: Ivan against Katrina is a comparison of claim counts, one year apart, and no deflator changes it. Treat every cross-decade dollar comparison on this page as unreliable, and use the counts.

11.1% of claims belong to no named event

3,874 claims carry no FEMA floodEvent label. They are counted in every total, every year, every zone and every ZIP on this page, and they appear in none of the event rows. The event table therefore describes 88.9% of the record, not all of it, and the sum of the event rows is deliberately less than the two-county total.

A closed claim is a settlement, not an assessment

The net paid amount is what NFIP paid after adjustment, deductible and policy limits. A total loss on a home insured below its replacement cost shows up here as the policy limit, not the loss. Coverage limits compress the top of this distribution in a way that no field in the dataset lets you measure.

Why this is a ZIP map and not a pin map.

The claims dataset does carry latitude and longitude. Both are rounded to one decimal degree — roughly 11 kilometers, about seven miles — as deliberate privacy protection, because each row is one household's insurance claim on one address. At that resolution a coordinate does not identify a property, a street or a neighborhood. It identifies a rectangle large enough to hold most of Mobile Bay.

Plotting those coordinates as dots would produce a map that looks precise and is not. Points would stack into a lattice at every tenth of a degree, and a reader would reasonably infer that a dot marks a house. So this pipeline does not fetch the coordinate fields at all. The spatial unit is the 5-digit ZIP Code FEMA already reports, drawn on 2020 Census ZCTA boundaries, and the map claims exactly the resolution the source supports.

The same rule applied to everything downstream

No individual claim record leaves the fetch script. Rows are pulled, aggregated in memory, and discarded; the generated data module and the published CSV contain only counts, sums and medians. There is no claim identifier, no date of loss on a single claim, no coordinate and no address anywhere in the shipped artifacts. That is checkable rather than promised — the module is a plain TypeScript file, and the CSV is the module re-serialized.

Everything needed to run it again.

The source is public domain and needs no account, no key and no approval. Two filtered queries against one federal endpoint reproduce the entire dataset.

ParameterValue
SourceFEMA OpenFEMA, NfipClaims v3
https://www.fema.gov/api/open/v3/NfipClaims
Filter$filter=countyCode eq '01097' (Mobile) and $filter=countyCode eq '01003' (Baldwin)
Paging$top=1000, $orderby=id, $skip advanced per page
Stable ordering so a re-fetch pages identically. Throttled under two requests per second with exponential backoff on 429 and 5xx.
Record count19,745 Baldwin + 15,116 Mobile = 34,861
Reconciled against the endpoint's own metadata.count per county at fetch time; a mismatch throws rather than publishing a partial pull.
Dollar fieldsnetBuildingPaymentAmount + netContentsPaymentAmount + netIccPaymentAmount
FEMA's amount-actually-paid fields. The parallel amountPaidOn* family is fetched too and reconciled every run; the two agree to within about 0.15%, differing only on a small number of voided or reissued-check cases.
Grouping key for ZIP(reportedZipCode, county) pair
See section 05 for why the ZIP alone is wrong.
Code decodingFEMA's published v3 data dictionary
causeOfDamage and occupancyTypeare numeric or alpha codes. Anything not in FEMA's table is emitted as Unknown code rather than guessed.
Data freshnessFEMA asOfDate 2026-08-03
FEMA's own freshness field, carried on the records. Losses run 1978-01-15 to 2026-06-18.
Boundaries2020 Census ZIP Code Tabulation Areas
Census TIGERweb, simplified with Douglas-Peucker and projected to a planar frame. 63 ZCTAs across the two counties.

One endpoint detail matters for anyone reproducing this after October. FEMA froze the older v2 FimaNfipClaims endpoint on 1 June 2026 and removes it on 15 October 2026. This dataset is built on the successor, v3 NfipClaims, whose response envelope key is NfipClaims rather than FimaNfipClaimsand which carries 84 fields against v2's 73. All seventeen fields this pipeline selects exist on both. The two endpoints do not return identical counts — v3 is live rather than frozen — so a v2 replication will land a few claims short and that is expected, not an error.

The fetch script is a single Node file in this site's repository, and the generated data module it writes is what this page and the CSV both read. Re-running it is the whole refresh procedure. If a figure here does not match what FEMA returns for you, tell me and the page gets corrected and re-dated.

Take the data.

One CSV holds every aggregate on this page: the overall totals, all 138 ZIP-and-county rows, all 49 years, all 27 FEMA-labeled events, all 37 rated zones, all 12 cause codes and all 14 occupancy codes. It is generated from the same constants this page renders from, so the published numbers and the downloadable numbers cannot drift apart.

Download cds-gulf-coast-flood-losses.csv

Cite this

Campbell, Peyton. “Gulf Coast Flood Losses: NFIP Paid Claims in Mobile and Baldwin County, Alabama, 1978 to 2026.” Campbell Digital Studio, 2026-08-15. Data as of 2026-08-03. www.campbelldigitalstudio.com/research/gulf-coast-flood-losses.

Article and aggregate dataset licensed CC BY 4.0. Reuse the numbers, the tables and the map with attribution — and carry the limits in section 06 with them, because a figure from this page quoted without them says something it does not support.

Underlying claims data: FEMA, OpenFEMA NFIP Claims v3, a US federal government work in the public domain. Boundaries: US Census Bureau, 2020 ZIP Code Tabulation Areas. FEMA does not endorse this analysis and had no part in it.

Published 2026-08-15 against FEMA data as of 2026-08-03. Corrections welcome — section 05 is what one looks like when it lands.

Want this run on your county?

The pipeline is two county codes and a filter. Any county in the United States has the same record sitting in the same federal endpoint, and the same caveats apply to all of them. If you want this built for your market — or you have found something wrong in the numbers above — send the details. The second one is more useful to me.

Inquire about a projectRead the other study
Call (251) 370-0292Start a project